First aid on a Belgian construction site: keep a usable intervention record

Short answer: Keep the victim and first-aid provider, place, date, time, description and circumstances, nature of the intervention and any witnesses in the first-aid record. Protect the personal data while preserving follow-up.

Why this needs a separate site decision

A note saying ‘minor cut treated’ is too thin for prevention analysis or a later deterioration. The record needs enough factual detail to connect the event, care, witness and any subsequent reporting without inventing a diagnosis.

This practical guide supports Belgian construction companies, but does not replace a risk assessment, instruction, statutory inspection or advice from a competent specialist. The current official source remains authoritative. Check the actual company, person, equipment, contract, location and construction phase; a general article cannot replace exceptions or later changes.

What the official source establishes

• The victim and the person providing first aid are identified.
• Place, date, time, description and circumstances belong in the record.
• The nature of the intervention is recorded.
• The identity of any witnesses must also be retained.

For each point, record the source version and the date on which it was reviewed. Keep information received, content checked and a task actually released as distinct states. A colleague should be able to reconstruct the decision later without filling gaps with assumptions.

Build a traceable control gate

1. Open one access-controlled record immediately after the intervention.
2. Enter observed facts without adding an unverified diagnosis or cause.
3. Link the provider, witnesses and first aid actually given.
4. Have the right person complete missing fields promptly.
5. Keep follow-up and any formal accident report as linked but separate steps.

Give every step one owner, a deadline and a verifiable result. A notification, upload or automated suggestion prepares work; it is not automatically the statutory inspection or human release. Block the dependent task when evidence is missing, unreadable or no longer matches the current situation.

Keep evidence without false certainty

Keep the original document or observation, reviewer, time and decision as separate data. Do not overwrite an old version: mark it as superseded and explain why a new check was needed. Connect evidence to the project, work zone, equipment or person without exposing confidential data beyond the roles that need it.

Use dashboards to find open points, not to abstract away missing evidence. A status should lead back to the source, valid period and competent role. Schedule a recheck before validity expires or the next construction phase starts.

Avoid this mistake

Do not use a general site diary message as a substitute for the complete protected first-aid record.

If anything is unclear, pause the dependent activity, record the exact question and consult the current official source or a competent specialist. Then retain both the answer and the updated site instruction.

Frequently asked questions

Can Enfin make the official safety decision?

No. Enfin can connect documents, tasks, planning, owners and evidence. The employer, prevention adviser, competent inspector or other responsible person follows the applicable procedure and makes the formal decision.

Which statuses are useful?

Separate prepared, requested, received, reviewed, rejected and released. Keep a date, owner and source for each transition; one green tick cannot represent the whole evidence chain.

When should the control reopen?

Reopen it after a change in location, setup, task, person, supplier, version, incident or official guidance. An earlier release only covers the situation that was actually assessed.

Read next

• Construction document version control
• Construction photo documentation

Browse the English construction insights, review pricing, or discuss your workflow.